Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campfire (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Campfire (video game)[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Campfire (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

WP:NOTABILITY - this is an unreleased and, as best as can be told, never-to-be-released video game. The articles that are used as sources treat the project as significant because it was expected at the time of the article that it would be a released game. There's no sign that this unreleased/non-existent work has any particular impact on the field or the world. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 21:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in RS search (unrelated to Campfire Legends). IGN link is meager PR, Worthplaying is not a WP:VG/RS, and last ref is unhelpful. Unless offline sources are found, game is NN. Consider merging any notable parts into dev's page. czar · · 21:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete while some unreleased games can be notable (Star Fox 2, and while it die finally come out Duke Nukem Forever would have been notable regardless) there is nothing to indicate that this particular unreleased game is notable.--174.93.171.10 (talk) 01:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication that this will be notable or that the production of the game itself is notable in any way. Holyfield1998 (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable videogame. — ΛΧΣ21™ 21:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Other articles: GamesRadar, unseen64.net. Sadly I don't have access to any general video game mags from 2003. --Odie5533 (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.