Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign Cloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign Cloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article about the campaigning service with primary references, press releases and 2 news entries (at Softpedia and CNN-hosted blog) both being evidently based on Microsoft's press release of June 4, 2010 (reference #1 as of this revision). I could find some more sources online, still all of them qualify for passing mention at best. If this service is considered notable at all, the article still can't be properly written due to the lack of sources that could be used for verification. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This software does not seem to have generated any significant coverage from independent reliable sources. As nominator notes, it's mostly sourced to press releases, and that is pretty much what I found at Google News. I supposed it could be redirected to ElectionMall Technologies. --MelanieN (talk) 03:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Well, no it couldn't. That article has been deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElectionMall Technologies. --MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | babble _ 14:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another bare mention by a semi-reliable source here. This page smacks of promotion/advertising, but I didn't see anything approaching IRS in a reasonable search. No appropriate merge target. BusterD (talk) 11:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.