Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Rising Sun (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 16:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Camp Rising Sun[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Camp Rising Sun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article completely lacks reliable secondary sources, and I have been unable to find any. Dendlai (talk) 03:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite a well-known international camp, as the list of alumni would indicate. (In checking for refs, in Google News, [1] there are other camps with the same name--thus my search string.) But the following two should be sufficient to show notability: in the NY Times (a tribute to the founder), and The Christian Science Monitor. Plus [2]. & a number of refs to non-US newspapers from various countries that sent one or more campers & considered it notable. (There is COI: I went there myself.) DGG (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll admit that I can't read most of the refs provided, since they require payment, so I can't comment on their reliability. I'd say it seems like a small number of hits for a camp claiming huge notability, and many of them seems quite trivial. If somebody who could read them would comment, it'd be appreciated. Dendlai (talk) 01:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Strong indications of notability. Needs better references and I see DGG has uncovered some. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.