Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Moshava (Wisconsin)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Moshava (Wisconsin)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No non-trivial coverage in independent sources found. After a four-month grace period, no one with paper sources has come forward either. Danger (talk) 16:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of third-party sources. I didn't see any third-party sources that seemed notable on both Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability with no independent sources. Royal broil 00:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Camp Moshava (Pennsylvania). They are both branchs of the same camp (see this Beni Akiva doc). As a "name brand" Camp Moshava is notable having been around for over 80 years. I don't think that the individual camps are notable and the resultant individual articles read to me as ad copy. Joe407 (talk) 04:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If there's significant independent coverage of the "Camp Moshava phenomenon" (if you will) as a whole, then it makes sense to merge to a central page Camp Moshava, but if no such coverage exists than it seems pointless. Danger (talk) 04:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.