Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilla de Castro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 12:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camilla de Castro[edit]

Hasn't won any notable awards, has not started any new trends or done any groundbreaking work, and the only Tv media she appeared in was an obscure show, and not mainstream, and thefore fails to meet WP:PORNBIO criteria. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 23:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She was a very notable Brazilian porn actress and her death was mentioned in various papers. Callelinea (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:PORNBIO. No sources to show she was "mentioned in various papers." and even if there was she, this doesn't automatically mean she's notable, there are lots of people who kill themselves and are mentioned in newspapers, who do not have Wikipedia articles. Xeron220 (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources apparent. Epbr123 (talk) 22:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is a stub (on sources). She was noteworthy in her genre, and country. Baga34 (talk) 01:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing notable here. Even if her death was notable WP:BLP1E applies --T-rex 19:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only sources appear to be blogs and obits. Without better sourcing, there is no evidence that the subject meets any notability guideline.--Kubigula (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eastmain (talk) 11:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, failing WP:PORNBIO. There's a lot of noise on filesharing sites and blogs, but I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources about her. News about her death isn't enough, and I can't see that she was noteworthy enough in her genre & country to warrant an encyclopaedic entry. --Amalthea^Talk 11:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP, She is famous. Although it seems most editors are bigots.--Amalthea^Talk 11:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.96.169.141 (talk) [reply]

Keep. Although some people may not have liked who she was, what she represented, or even what she did in the porn arena, she was the most repected Transsexual of her generation, and a notable TV personality in her native Brazil. I just don't quite understand the desire to "Delete" this person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathendude (talk • contribs) 12:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Why delete? She was quite well known.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.