Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camila Guiribitey (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. g5able as the creation of a sock of Wesleyner7. The only keep votes were from socks. It has the malodour of UPE spam. Cabayi (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camila Guiribitey[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Camila Guiribitey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid-for-spam with no claim of notability. Previous AFD consensus was influenced by SPA/sock[1] and [2]. References are paid PR. Ninjaediator (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a sock or anything, I've requested the checkuser to check my ip. 2019KB (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC) Ninjaediator (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • DeleteThe origins of the creation of this article are such we must delete it if our policies have any menaing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The nominator Ninjaediator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. However, the nomination has some merit so I will not close this debate. MER-C 18:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Most of her coverage is in spanish news publishers but still she passes General Notability Guideline. 2019KB (talk) 22:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - She has been significantly featured in El Nuevo Diario (República Dominicana), laneta.com (in Spanish), CiberCuba (in Spanish), Hoy Digital (in Spanish) making her notable. 2019KB (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also I've added new reference from https://cdn.com.do/ She is quite notable in latin america with over 1.7 million followers.

There are other sources too of her attending latin's grammy and her pretty luxurious life but I haven't added because I'm not sure whether if it would be perfect for Wikipedia or not

She was invited on latin grammy: https://cdn.com.do/2019/11/20/camila-guiribitey-dice-que-sintio-mezcla-de-emociones-indescriptible-en-su-primera-vez-en-grammy-latino/ 2019KB (talk) 22:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Nom is a sock, Keep voter is a Sock, and previuos nomination was hijacked by socks. Whe! ok!. The article is still deletable, nothing to show that she can pass GNG.MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Camila_Guiribitey_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=956124789"