Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camila Alire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Camila Alire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional Mr. Guye (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - faulty nomination: "promotional" isn't a reason for deletion, you need to argue why this particular article in Category:Presidents of the American Library Association is somehow less notable than all the others. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Eminent librarian and member of the National Council on the Humanities. Clearly notable. Also not in any way promotional. Bizarre reason for nomination. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep while it could be pruned a little, that's a reason for editing not deletion. I do think some was copy/pasted from a CV and have consequently tied to fix the formatting a little StarM 03:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.