Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Gaunce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Gaunce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player who has not yet established himself to meet notability requirements per WP:NHOCKEY. Prod was contested. Pparazorback (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —Pparazorback (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Pparazorback (talk) 01:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Rationale for removing the prod was that the subject passes WP:ATHLETE, but didn't WP:NHOCKEY and the other sport specific notability guidelines replace WP:ATHLETE? Regardless, there is no evidence that the subject passes WP:GNG, and of course, he does not pass WP:NHOCKEY either. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 02:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, WP:NSPORT of which WP:NHOCKEY is a part of did replace WP:ATHLETE. I believe the prod remover was not up to date on his guideline knowledge as the change happened about a year ago. -DJSasso (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.