Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Duke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Duke[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youth footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY --BlameRuiner (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pre COVID, seems like it would have been a clear draftify. Now, who knows? Not notable as it currently stands. SportingFlyer T·C 03:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Ping me if sources are found which might meet GNG. Giant Snowman 08:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally fails our guidelines for foootballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.