Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameleon (IDE)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cameleon (IDE)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

makes no claims of notability Domdeparis (talk) 18:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with all haste. As much as it pains me to delete OCaml-related material, this page is an obvious and abject mess. I used the Cameleon IDE, very briefly (it's quite horrible by modern standards), and I'm pretty sure it's got nothing whatsoever to do with the company mentioned here, which the article says is traded as... a template (PA) for a Harry Potter book ?!. Not sure if it's a joke. As for the notability of the editor itself, even in the niche of OCaml users I don't think it is terribly popular. Even if the article made a claim of notability, I doubt it could be sustained. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 20:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG and/or WP:NSOFT. Brianga (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. The Techcrunch reference talks about Cameleon (software), which is a different topic. Or redirect to the software page. Binksternet (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look like Cameleon (software) involves an IDE, so a redirect would not be appropriate here. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 22:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.