Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodian Children's Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Number 5 7 16:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodian Children's Trust[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

small charity in one Cambodian city; population served: 300 DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually a strong keep for this one. The restaurant operated by the group has received very substantial coverage for example here and here. Whether or not the group's activities are local to one area or relatively small in scale they have garnered very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. And I mean, it's nice to have article on positive subjects. I do think the article could use some work and better state it's significance. The descriptions sections also need tightening up. Candleabracadabra (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Struck !vote above of blocked sock puppet, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per Candelabracadabra and seems notable. Founder Tara Winkler appears notable for an article on herself alone, but can be handled in this article. A link in the article is dead, but I confirmed her NSW Young Australian of the Year Award here. --do ncr am 01:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Coverage of the restaurant would make the restaurant notable. Notability is not inherit from there. There is nothing sourced in this current advert worth keeping to help write an article for Jaan Bai. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per Duffbeerforme. Fails GNG. SW3 5DL (talk) 14:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Doing a quick Google search, I found two reliable sources. The first is a news article [[1]] about the Cambodian Children’s Trust. The second is a website that states that the founder was named a finalist for Australian of the Year [2] for founding the Cambodian Children’s Trust and gives a description of the organizationTHe sources are kind of slim, but they do exist. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, tiny charity with apparent limited coverage by independent media (mainly in the home country of one of its foreign founders). Sietecolores (talk) 21:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete 2 weeks after AfD listing and still no evidence of significant coverage. The founder may have a claim for notability but that does not follow this organization is automatically notable. This fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.