Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calzona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Calzona[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect My only previous input was to have put it up for PROD (subsequently declined) on notability grounds. It has been tagged for notability and reliable sources for more than a week with no content edits. The term "Calzona" is in use on Grey's Anatomy fan sites and possibly reliable sources such as Hollywood Reporter, but the article seems an unnecessary fork from Grey's Anatomy. At best a redirect with a one line explanation of the term at Grey's Anatomy. Meters (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Grey's has no wikilink to nor mention of it, so it's just fancruft OR. — Wylie pedia 15:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.