Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call of Duty 8: Nano Warfare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Call of Duty 8: Nano Warfare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources in the article, poor formatting (page wizard obviously wasn't used). I contacted the editor and didn't receive a response. The other account that was used in editing this, an anonymous IP address, has been linked to vandalism. In addition, some of the text at the end of the article was purely opinion. Mrmewe (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as G3: Blatant hoax. Seriously? Charlie the Unicorn? What was even the point in making this AfD when it's also been CSDed? --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Complete bunch of useless arse, Charlie the Unicorn indeed.. "Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarlie, candy mountain" etc. etc. Someone another 19:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.