Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call of Duty 2: Big Red One Character List
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was *. This was clipped from the main article for being too long, apparently there's not a consensus to keep this as a standalone article. So I will move "main characters" back to the main article, redirect this article so the history is preserved, and editors interested in this topic can figure out where to go from here. W.marsh 18:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Call of Duty 2: Big Red One Character List (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Listcruft. No citations, non-notable. Character list was taken from deleted sections in Call of Duty 2: Big Red One article, which was originally removed as a violation of Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list. Nothing makes the characters notable, and compiling all the characters along with all the randomly generated names into one list doesn't make it any more notable. Scottie theNerd 20:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the main characters back into Call of Duty 2: Big Red One, but the rest of this list is pointlessly detailed and should be deleted. — brighterorange (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't have a copy of it with me, but I get the feeling that the main character descriptions are taken from the manual. --Scottie theNerd 01:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Brighterorange. TJ Spyke 00:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or delete per Brighterorange, assuming no copyvios. Stifle (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as unsourced, with no objection to giving the main characters a mention in the main article. Addhoc 15:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Addhoc.--Wehwalt 18:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.