Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call of Cthulhu: Destiny's End

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth. Courcelles 02:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Call of Cthulhu: Destiny's End

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased game product that is in no way notable enough to have it's own Wikipedia article. At best it's worth a brief mention in the article of the game this was supposed to be a sequel to... and all that article does mention about it is that it was supposed to exist but doesn't. Tried just redirecting out but another editor insists on reverting. DreamGuy (talk) 01:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DreamGuy is clearly not aware of the whole category cancelled video games (with hundreds of titles). Or this, for example.

Also, he hates plots in video games (must-be in video game articles) and template "Empty section". Very, very strange. --Niemti (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

His thoughts on plot sections are irrelevant to whether or not this article is notable. Outside of questioning a bad faith nomination or failing to follow through on WP:BEFORE, this isn't an examination on the nominator - it's about the article at hand. Stick to commenting on that. Sergecross73 msg me 16:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral There does seem to be a few reliable sources out there, but not many... Cyan Gardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 03:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the multiple RS'es documenting its abortive proto-existance. Having said that, the best solution is probably to find somewhere to merge it to, but that's an editorial decision not requiring AfD. Jclemens (talk) 04:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merging can very well be discussed here as well, especially if there are editors that are challenging merging/redirecting... Sergecross73 msg me 16:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Merge - Not sure about this. There is a little coverage, but there's really not much here. Half the article seems to be the lead, reiterating the rest of the article, and a rather large quote ripped from the game's archived website. It seems like it could be merged/redirected into a "Legacy" or "Sequels" section to the Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth. Unsure for now, it kinda depends if I or someone else can find more to put in there at this point... Sergecross73 msg me 16:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge useful content to Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth - That's what we do with cancelled direct sequels usually, and this article doesn't seem to have the significant independent coverage to stand by itself (although it certainly has enough to be discussed in the parent article). Salvidrim! 06:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Salvidrim's reasoning. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.