Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CallMeKevin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted by Deb (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CallMeKevin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
spammy article about a non notable YTer with no meaningful coverage despite his follower count. time to put this to rest since several SPAs seem hell bent on spamming mainspace with this despite it's repeated creations Praxidicae (talk) 16:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and salt, this is the 5th or 6th time this has been created under various names (it gets A7'd every time) and 2 million followers isn't enough to constitute a credible claim of significance. Creator is obsessively dedicated to recreating this utterly non-notable and unencyclopedic page and also including a bunch of BLP violations in it. Nuke it from orbit. Spicy (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per User:Spicy. Gazamp (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a case of WP:PROMOTION only. No notability. ~ Amkgp 💬 17:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - non-notable. And salt, since the creator has shown they'll use socks to re-create/contest deletion, and it's been deleted enough times. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 22:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and salt. The only reason this AfD entry exists is that the article creator removed the speedy deletion template as a sock puppet (now blocked indefinitely). The article is clearly speedy deletion material.—J. M. (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.