Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call-ace whist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Whist. (non-admin closure) !dave 10:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Call-ace whist[edit]

Call-ace whist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced game guide. Coin945 (talk) 06:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Whist. Pagat says Danish Whist, which exists in two forms: one with fixed partnerships, and one in which partners are chosen by calling an ace [1]. I've played Sheepshead (game) with this rule for partner selection, and have no reason to doubt the game is played in that fashion. However, there are no references (and I found none), and there's unlikely to be content to justify a stand-alone article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greenland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greenland-related deletion discussions. -- HindWikiConnect 13:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.