Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Patriot (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. I withdraw this nomination. Two of the sources ([1], [2]) provide significant coverage, thus the topic meets WP:GNG. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

California Patriot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A topic about a student-run magazine from the University of California, Berkeley that appears to fail WP:GNG. Additional opinion about the notability of print media on Wikipedia can be read at Wikipedia:Notability (media). Custom searches such as this are also failing to yield significant coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep To my surprise I found a lot of coverage in national-level Reliable Sources including Time Magazine, the Boston Globe, and the San Diego Union-Tribune. This is very unusual for a small student publication and IMO it is clearly notable. I added three sources to the article and stripped out the unsubstantiated and promotional material. --MelanieN (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just those three references in the article are enough to pass the notability threshold. §FreeRangeFrog 20:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.