Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calico System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calico System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Generally unsourced metalcore band. I cannot find much in the way of coverage beyond a brief AllMusic profile and a few one-liner mentions of their breakup in 2007 quoting their MySpace profile. There may be other coverage out there, but they're generally being outcompeted in searches by an obscure firearms manufacturer and systems based on other things called Calico, of which there are many. I am just not seeing sufficient substantial coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability, nor sourced evidence of anything else in WP:BAND. ~ mazca ^talk 19:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~ mazca ^talk 19:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Three full-length albums on Eulogy meets WP:MUSIC; AMG bio already cited in source; a number of contemporaneous reviews are still available online (AltPress, Scenepointblank, Allmusic again, Cleveland Scene). Chubbles (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above that show independent critical analysis of their works so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.