Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleche Manos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caleche Manos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Manos only thing that comes close to a claim to fame is being Miss Nevada. However that is not a title that conveys notability. In fact of the 4 sources with the article, the 4th is a Las Vegas Review Journal article that basically screams "Miss American pageant does not matter anymore." Of the 4 sources, only one is about her, and that is the very local paper from her part of Nevada. One Las Vegas article fact checks her loss the previous year. The other 2 exist because the Miss America pageant was in Las Vegas and only mention her in passing. A google search showed up a few articles about her suing the Los Angeles police department in 2012 for how she was treated when investigators went to her apartment instead of the one they had a warrant for. However that would be excluded on "Wikipedia is not news" guidelines. We have nothing of substance about her to justify notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion was originally closed as no consensus because there is a lack of Wikipedia consensus on the matter on December 6th, after I presented some issues to the closer, and another editor argued that these should be considered on a case by case basis, the administrator who closed gave permission to reopen this discussion. I primarily state this so the time frame when this discussion has actually been open can be clearly seen. It was closed from early December 6th (about 7 GMT) to about 14 GMT on December 9th.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Being a beauty pageant winner is not enough in itself to prove notability.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a mere participation is only trivial and is therefore not exchangeable for notability and substance, not is the fact that's all there exists to say. SwisterTwister talk 23:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.