Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Tiller (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Caleb Tiller[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Caleb Tiller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Football player who does not meet WP:ATHLETE having never played a first team match in the fully professional Australian Football League. He has now been cut from the Carlton list so it is unlikely now that ever will. Regardless, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Mattinbgn (talk) 11:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ATHLETE and seems that he never will. Jenks24 (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and stick to only having articles for players who have made their debut. StAnselm (talk) 11:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable, WP:ATHLETE. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:46, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not in first team. WWGB (talk) 12:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:GNG not met. Pick 80 is unlikely to have much written about him, but unlike St Anselm I would argue that most first round picks, and some lower picks, would satisfy GNG, regardless of ATHLETE. Also plenty of players get redrafted, so future undeletion is possible. The-Pope (talk) 15:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.