Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Stephen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 02:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb Stephen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant, in-depth coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Every citation on the article appears to be to one of the subject's own columns, or to a profile page on a publication where he's published. Declined prod. Neutrality^talk 22:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not find any independent sources. For fairness, I will message the article creator Webdude124 and the person who removed the original prod notice, Geekywebguy2017. Neither of them have been notified of this discussion. 06:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete journalist lacking the level of 3rd-party coverage we need to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - completely lacking any reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.