Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Galicia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NoVomit's opinion does not address the lack of sources about the subject herself. Sandstein 08:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Caitlin Galicia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article deals with a minor actor, who has appeared in a few insignificant bit parts on television. There's also an assertion of musical notability, but no evidence is provided. (In other words, fails both WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:MUSICBIO.) Additionally many details of her life are trivial and unreferenced. There's probably a promotional motive at work as well: the article lists a talent agency, and alleged career plans. To top it off, the article provides a list of her "good friends" (and their dubiously-notable Wikipedia articles). The primary editor of this article (66.215.178.213) has removed tags for improvement on a couple of occasions, without improving the article—this implies unwillingness to improve through normal editing. Therefore, delete. TheFeds 01:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:BIO/WP:ENTERTAINER. Minor acting roles with little to no coverage by reliable sources. One of the "references" interestingly points back to the Wikipedia page for more information. Notability not even asserted. • Gene93k (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet notability guidelines ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. The shows she was in are notable, so some margin exists for claims of notability. NoVomit (talk) 12:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to see the print reference mentioned in the article (first on the list) and I'd like to see which company/theatre she did Les Miserables with. Both of these are crucial in properly determining notability. - Mgm|(talk) 17:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.