Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caio César Tavera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 03:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caio César Tavera[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Challenged PROD, concern was "Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league." No indication that the player meets notability standards. C 679 13:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 13:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Are the stats in the infobox correct? If he has played for Cruzeiro or Atalanta then he would meet the criteria. Number 5 7 14:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stats and articles for Cruzeiro and Atalanta indicate he is or has been a player for these teams. Almost all drafted NFL players have a page whether they talk or not they ever play in a game this should be no different for Association Football. — Falerin^{<talk>,<contrib>} 15:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What happens re NFL players is totally irrelevant here. Number 57 15:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - My point is that if signed but not playing athletes in any sport are included they should be included in all of them. To do anything else reflects a systemic US Bias which is to be avoided on Wikipedia. — Falerin^{<talk>,<contrib>} 17:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No idea about the NFL comment; there is no indication this is a NFL player. Stats in the infobox for first two teams were not supported by any reference, I have updated the infobox to reflect this. C 679 18:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the stats for Cruzeiro and Atalanta were added without a reference after the article was PRODded [1]. C 679 18:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He is not. That was not the point; the point is what is good for the NFL is good for association football. I can see no coherent reason that different standards should be applied unless we are encouraging a US bias. I personally have no vested interest either way as I have little to no interest in athletics at all of any sort but I do have interest in avoiding systemic bias.— Falerin^{<talk>,<contrib>} 17:04, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's absolutely no reason to suggest that the NFL "policy" on Wikipedia is correct. This (association football) player hasn't made a significant impact in his profession and WP:NFOOTY specifically excludes players whose only "contribution" is sitting on the bench, which appears to be the case here. C 679 05:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Hasn't played in anything other than regional/state leagues which contain plenty of amateur clubs. Argyle 4 Life^talk 06:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.