Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadwgan ap Cadwaladr ap Gruffydd
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Cadwaladr ap Gruffydd. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cadwgan ap Cadwaladr ap Gruffydd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Zero notability to speak of. Perhaps his father had some, but it never rubbed off. JBsupreme (talk) 23:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Notability is not inherited "Little is known about his life". Martin451 (talk) 00:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Bearian.Martin451 (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Cadwaladr ap Gruffydd - his father's article, as he's not notable by himself, but useful nuggets of information exist, so merger is preferred in such cases. Bearian (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What verifiable information can be merged into Cadwaladr ap Gruffydd? If there is something really worth merging I wouldn't be opposed to that. JBsupreme (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to father as Bearian. Clearly NN. Delink the redlink to his alleged son. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge if the material can be verified, otherwise just redirect. No assertion of notability.--Cúchullain t/c 19:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.