Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadbury Snack (Australia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cadbury Snack. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cadbury Snack (Australia)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First, the link the bot says the article is a copyvio of redirects back here, so I'm not sure what to do about it. In any event, notability concerns - there are no reliable sources. Laun chba ller 20:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Moved the content to this new page because, the British version is nothing like the Australian version. I cant say more than that. --Crazyseiko (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Definitely not a copyvio, just a split that had been performed without the correct attribution. I've fixed that up now and removed the copyvio notice. I do agree with Crazyseiko that the Australian Cadbury Snack shares nothing in common with the British version except for the name and so the two should be in the same article. As to whether the Australian version is actually notable or should just redirect to somewhere like Cadbury#Australia and New Zealand I'm not sure. Other products of a similar nature all seem to have articles, but obviously that is a poor keep argument. Some significant coverage could perhaps be found in the Fairfax archive. Jenks24 (talk) 11:28, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to Cadbury Snack, from where it was split. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Hard to find much in the way of reliable sources even in the Faifax Archive or Google News. The best I could do was this. It's an entirely different product to the American Snack, so I lean towards a redirect to Cadbury#Australia and New Zealand unless better sources can be found.Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge - notability not established (which is hardly suprising, since it's a confectionary product without any historical significance...even if it is yummy!) 1292simon (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.