Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabela's Big Game Hunter: Pro Hunts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Deletion nom, keep/merge/redirect arguments, all with valid points. I'm closing as no consensus after 20 days with a recommendation to continue discussion of a potential merge ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  17:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cabela's Big Game Hunter: Pro Hunts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:GNG. Some of the sources added are not reliable: FPSPresitge.com, GameVicio (which is just user-submitted news), and TrueAchievements appears to be user-submitted news as well. None offer significant coverage beyond reposting screenshots that were issued in a press release. Odie5533 (talk) 14:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Three sources out of the seven currently listed may not be reliable, but the article should not be deleted just because of it since the others are. Although, I will remove said sources and/or replace them with others. Cheat2win (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I still think the game may not be notable enough for an article. Perhaps instead, we could start a new article at Cabela's Big Game Hunter that would discuss the entire Big Game Hunter series including the latest Pro Hunts game? Alternatively (or additionally), we could have a Cabela's video games article that would describe each of the different Cabela's series in detail, including the Big Game Hunter series. As it stands, we sort of have a bunch of really short articles about each game which doesn't serve the readers well. And many of the games are not notable enough for their own articles, even though some do currently have articles. --Odie5533 (talk) 17:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with making such article, like you said, which is similar to how the Deer Hunter series is being handled. Maybe a Cabela's video games would be indeed the better option. Cheat2win (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~~ (talk) 19:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Antarctica 03:29, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.