Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabbagetown Group Softball League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cabbagetown Group Softball League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a neighbourhood amateur sports league, not referenced to any evidence of reliable source coverage about it for the purposes of establishing its notability under our inclusion standards for sports organizations. The only sources here are its own self-published website about itself and an archival fonds of its own internal organizational papers (reaggregated on two different websites, but the same fonds). But the existence of an archival fonds is not a notability criterion in and of itself -- for the purposes of a Wikipedia article, the notability test is a question of the extent to which the organization has or hasn't been the subject of journalistic coverage in media, of which none has been shown and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to show any. Bearcat (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Softball-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence this meets GNG, and all of the sources ultimately seem to derive from the league. Eldumpo (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as nominated. Doesn't meet WP:GNG and certainly not WP:NBASEBALL. PK T(alk) 20:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.