Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CVTT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 17:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CVTT[edit]

should be deleted because: (1) the title of the article is incorrectly spelled, and (2) the content of the article is contained in an article under the proper title CVVT. MadScientistVX 01:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Redirect to Continuous_variable_valve_timing to avoid a double-redirect and to catch a typo such as the one the auther of this article made. Ruby 01:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect is already in place. --Lockley 05:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Please do not redirect CVTT to something spelled CVVT. That's confusing. --Perfecto 06:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no redirect as per Perfecto. -- Kjkolb 06:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no redirect. (aeropagitica) 07:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, same material was also on CVVT and is already merged. I don't see the use of redirecting this one. Next, someone's going to confuse it with CCTV. Then what? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I guess AndyChrist copied CVTT to CVVT when he created it. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-25 10:53Z
Delete per Perfecto.--Adam ^(talk) 14:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Perfecto's perfectly perspicacious perspective. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 14:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not worth it, non-notable. —This user has left wikipedia 16:22 2006-01-25
Delete per nom. Latinus 20:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.