Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTA International
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Shimeru (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CTA International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original nominator did not specify reason for deletion
- This article was under development when it was flagged for deletion. CTA International is a multi-national joint venture company that is supplying a new weapon technology to both UK and French armed forces. The article was flagged for deletion without any indication of the reason, which is unhelpful. I have been adding to the article and believe that we should keep, as I beleive it is notable, and is now linked to several other significant articles. welsh (talk) 08:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There is enough notible information here and the sources are also notible. ~ Joker264 (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - plenty of evidence of notability in GHits - the article does need to be worked on to show it however. (GregJackP (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 04:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 04:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added in a number of sources from my Google search. They seem to easily point to notability, from their coverage of the company. SilverserenC 04:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.