Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSI Church Kaliakkavilai
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject) by Bbb23
- CSI Church Kaliakkavilai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. A church in India of no particular distinction. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 03:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete: WP:CSD#A7 as an article about an organization that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is yet another example of @Adam9007: wasting the community's time with his hyper-aggressive speedy deletion declines. (related ANI discussion) Toddst1 (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure this is an organisation; I checked, and this definitely comes under a category called "Buildings and Structures". Adam9007 (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Churches can refer to both buildings and organizations but a church as an organization does not need a building. Organizations are founded, buildings are built. This article says it was both founded and built. Information in the article asserts absolutely no importance about either the building or the organization and the article has no place on wikipedia. This whole discussion is downright pedantic. WP:SNOWBALL and move on. Toddst1 (talk) 23:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure this is an organisation; I checked, and this definitely comes under a category called "Buildings and Structures". Adam9007 (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment As I mentioned on Adam9007's talk page, if the article were about the building, we'd have a different point (although the AFD would still be valid, as the building does not appear at all significant), but in this case, the article is about the church as an organization. It is an organization that happens to be housed in a building (as almost all are), but the article (talking as it does mostly about the founding of the church and its various leaders) is about the organization, not about the building. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.