Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRASS Infotech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CRASS Infotech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not appear to meet WP:CORP. I performed a fairly thorough search for sources, and couldn't find anything that wasn't lifted from the company's website. A PROD tag was removed by the creator, who has a self-confessed COI. This could almost be deleted under CSD#A7, except for a couple of claims in the article that would grant notability if sourced. Nonetheless, the sources don't seem to exist; so delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. Refs and ELs are all associated with the company or non-RS, user editable sites. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 07:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks the multiple reliable independent secondary sources needed to establish notability under WP:GNG. Sources offered are all either primary or otherwise unsuitable. Googling turned up absolutely nothing. Msnicki (talk) 08:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Shameless promotional of a non-notable company. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
del nn - üser:Altenmann >t 15:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (possible A7/G11): A WP:SPA article on a recent new company promoting their wares with no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Dcirovic (talk) 06:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.