Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CPF Building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep due to withdrawal. This is a Non-Admin Close.  UzEE  01:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

CPF Building

CPF Building (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I dont think its notable as there are no references towards notability.  UzEE  01:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment: I am sorry for leaving out the under-construction tag. As creator, I will do my best to expand it. References will also be added by me. Thank you. Angcr (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Also add references to assert the notability of the article. Anyways I think this AfD should be closed?  UzEE  02:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment: I would agree too. I have added the fact that it houses the headquarters of the Central Provident Fund Board (Singapore's mandatory saving and social security plan). Angcr (talk) 02:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Withdraw: Seeing that the article has a great extent and is notable, I withdraw the AfD with a Speedy Keep.  UzEE  01:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Strong Keep simply based on creator's history. Unfortunately, the AFD placed on this article five minutes after it was created trashes its hopes at DYK (where I encountered it), but it's just as strong a contender as the other five DYK features Angcr has created. It's unlikely that an article at AfD will be selected for DYK, even if it is well-written and interesting. Horologium (talk) 08:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep Was nominated five minutes after creation and has now got references to establish notability. This AFD should be closed early to allow the article to be selected as a Did You Know. Davewild (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.