Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CONTROL (Professional Wrestling)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CONTROL (Professional Wrestling)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no indication of notability. No verification that this "stable" name is actually used. It's not mentioned in the ELs for the three members. MB 19:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. MB 19:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and to be honest this could have been a PROD. — Czello 19:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOR. The article is just a personal commentary. --Mann Mann (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:49, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:SIGCOV, no reason to keep. Jacona (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable lacking coverage or even sources. Also invokes POV. It is commentary, not even an article. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 17:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.