Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNN Coverage of Sago Mine Disaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy merge. Not an issue for AfD. Don't forget to leave a redirect to 2006 Sago Mine disaster when you're done. howcheng {chat} 08:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am not downplaying the tragedy at Sago Mine. I am just proposing that this article be appropriately merged with the main article under "Media Coverage" for example. It is just a little too much for there to be an encyclopedia article about a news channel's coverage of an event
--Jay (Reply) 04:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Good idea. It should be merged, but the information in the article kept as is (or edited normally in time). Contribution from Carlow, Ireland. 04:54 (GMT), 7 January 2006
- Agree. Merge into 2006 Sago Mine disaster. There is not enough content to warrant a separate article of the media coverage, let alone just of the CNN coverage. Crunch 04:38, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per CrunchDrIdiot 04:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to 2006 Sago Mine disaster per nom and Crunch. --Muchness 04:56, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Carlow. Ekpardo 04:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. --King of All the Franks 04:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into main article. This article could have been merged without Afd, right? --FloNight 05:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as above. I would like to echo FloNight's comments. I have taken the liberty of putting merge tags on CNN Coverage of Sago Mine Disaster and 2006 Sago Mine disaster#"Miscommunication" and wrong media reports. OCNative 06:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is articles for deletion. Please don't list articles you don't want deleted. Be bold and just merge it (or come to a consensus on the talk page first if you feel that others will object). howcheng {chat} 08:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.