Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Peacent 14:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CLSA

Listed for discussion after overturn at deletion review. Anas ^talk? 22:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete. this looks like an ad. Kripto 01:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP. As author of the article, I understand it's my responsibility to find online sources to document this company's notability. I will do that, as someone else kindly did for the article on CLSA's recently deceased co-founder, Gary Coull. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnome84 (talk • contribs) 03:23, 30 June 2007
- Was it really "someone else" who added those sources? (Or created that article?) —72.75.85.234 (talk · contribs) 07:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article asserts notability and appears to be sourced. It now needs severe cleanup. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 06:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is notable as a subsidiary of Credit Agricole.(Pls note that I work for one of their competitors in Hong Kong). --JuntungWu 10:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Needs clean-up and not deletion. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. Andre (talk) 02:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.