Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLC Philippines Formation Institute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
CLC Philippines Formation Institute[edit]
- CLC Philippines Formation Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability not established through reliable sources. Wizardman 02:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Philippines only Google search does not give independent coverage. Strongest hit that I got is some sort of announcement from Ateneo University.--Lenticel (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —bluemask (talk) 07:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 19:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 06:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A double relist for something I'm now sure is non-notable? heh, if you say so. Wizardman 18:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article that has been orphaned for two years - and orphaned articles are usually orphaned for a reason. No real demonstration of notability per WP:CORP. No reliable sources for WP:V. It's been about 16 months since the sourcing and notability tags were applied... It's time to put it out of its misery. B.Wind (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Notability neither established nor even asserted. Springnuts (talk) 18:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.