Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CKUT-FM
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CKUT-FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability? Janhrach (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada. Janhrach (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Janhrach, a one word question is not a strong or coherent argument for why this article warrants deletion. Can you elaborate beyond one word? Otherwise, this discussion might be closed. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- See many sources ....that said this will be closed as per reason for deletion?Moxy🍁 03:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Long-established licensed broadcaster with plenty of references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I grant that the article has some obvious sourcing problems in its current state, but not all of the sources in it are bad ones to start with, better sourcing does exist to replace the weaker stuff with, and university/college campus radio stations are judged by the same inclusion criteria as commercial radio stations per WP:NMEDIA. That is, it's not less notable than other radio stations in the same city just because it's owned by a university instead of a major commercial entity. So it could stand to be tagged for {{refimprove}}, but it's not deletion-worthy. Bearcat (talk) 17:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.