Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CIBC Development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- Scott Burley (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CIBC Development[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As written, this defunct corporate real estate development holding company is unremarkable with its real estate assets long since sold to other institutional buyers. Article is completely unreferenced and a quick Google quotation mark-enclosed phrase search reveals extremely little press coverage, limited only to one or two articles covering the sale of assets—matters that themselves are considered trite, trivial, and which fail WP:SIGCOV. As the corporation is defunct, there is no prospect of future WP:SIGCOV significant coverage. Thus, both as written and future potential, it fails WP:GNG, lacks WP:CORPDEPTH, and is arguably WP:CORPSPAM. Arguably never should've been created in the first place, so would favour delete as the name itself is an implausible redirect for CIBC. Doug Mehus (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note to AfD Closer - If delete is the result, I have done a quick check of the three property-related stub articles listed in CIBC Development and the first and last mention the disposition of the properties. The middle one, CIBC Tower, does not mention the sale, date of sale, or buyer, so will likely want to make sure that information is transposed there.Doug Mehus (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.