Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CIA activities in Israel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to CIA activities in Asia. If that is kept, else delete. Sandstein 20:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CIA activities in Israel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe that all of the "CIA activities in..." articles should be deleted—in fact, I'm a major contributor to two of the more notable ones, CIA activities in Iraq and CIA activities in Syria—but CIA activities in Israel seems to fail WP:GNG. The bit about Israel helping to aid the mujahideen in Afghanistan is already covered elsewhere, and the rest of this page is WP:OR sourced to a single National Intelligence Estimate. TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 November 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 20:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Joseph: As you know, this is WP:NOTAVOTE - if you can't advance even one argument don't bother commenting. AusLondonder (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to explain myself to you and I don't need to be bossed around by you either. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 21:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment just shows what a non serious vote this is. An admin will therefore disregard this in closing the AfD. LibStar (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Joseph demonstrating perfectly once again his trademark disruptive and unconstructive behaviour. AusLondonder (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or Merge - I think that the fact that so many country's activities have their own page, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS really seems to apply here. I hate to use that argument, which is why its very weak that I say keep. The page however needs a ton of work. Nothing on it shows why it would meet WP:GNG. The page in general needs a lot of work. If no one is willing to fix all the issues, I say just merge it into CIA activities in Asia and call it a day. - Galatz ^Talk 20:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Nothing on it shows why it would meet WP:GNG." That's an argument for deletion, not for keeping.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Looks like at the same time as this was going on, CIA activities in Asia was up for deletion as well, and it was deleted. The end result here was to merge into that page which is now deleted. Never seen this happen before. Now what? - Galatz ^Talk 18:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]