Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHX-I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

CHX-I

CHX-I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NOTABILITY.Schuym1 (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I, too, found little in terms of substantive references. Fails WP:N; get rid of it. Luinfana (talk) 05:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Apart from some mentions in forums and discussion, there are no sources indicating prevalent use. The firewall's last update was apparently 4 years ago. The developer is also nonexistent. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 14:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable, no reliables sources. Grsz¹¹ 16:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - no reliable sources. The only coverage I could find were forum posts and blog comments -- Whpq (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.