Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHINGA CHANG RECORDS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 09:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
CHINGA CHANG RECORDS[edit]
Was speedy tagged, but I disagree with the tag saying that no notability was asserted in the article. I don't think the case was made particularly well by the author of the article, but one notable and one semi-notable rapper signed to the label might be a case for notability. No Vote for me, but I thought this deserved a vote generally Irongargoyle 04:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability given, no Google results, and it was created by an editor by the name of DanEmack (the same name as the creator of this apparent record company). -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 05:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:MUSIC and WP:VAIN. --Coredesat 06:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NMG, WP:VAIN, WP:CORP and probably some other things besides. Just zis Guy you know? 09:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Fails basically every test. Kershner 22:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.