Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDRL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 08:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CDRL

dicdef Melaen 00:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As DicDef --Lightdarkness 00:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep TestPilot 01:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Any particular reason why it should be kept? --Lightdarkness 02:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Yes. That article is a stub, that eventually grow into appropriate enciclopedic article. Second - if someone ask wikipedia what is CDRL mean, he find at least some info(and it possible that even this short explanation would be enouph). And we got HUGE requested leagal article list, it might be possible that CDRL already there(or be there in a future). And the last one - you don't think we sould delete APXS article, do you? TestPilot 02:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at least as it now stands. If it's expanded into something useful, I may change my mind. Liamdaly620 01:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move to Wiktionary if possible. Peyna 03:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Transwiki to Wiktionary. → P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 05:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and transwiki to Wikitionary. --Ter e nc e Ong 05:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and replace with Template:Wi so people can be directed to wiktionary -- Astrokey44|talk 15:13, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. Hurricanehink 17:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki - Jim62sch 20:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Transwiki to Wiktionary - • Dussst • ^{T | C} 21:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a stub encyclopaedia article on Contract Data Requirements Lists, not a dictionary article on an initialism. The sources (that I've added) indicate that this stub can be expanded. Keep and rename to Contract Data Requirements List. Uncle G 16:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, expandable. Why the horizontal line above? Chick Bowen 19:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's to indicate the point at which I added the sources that I mentioned. Uncle G 18:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.