Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBC Music Top 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Newslinger (talk) 04:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CBC Music Top 20

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Does not meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage from reliable sources independent of CBC Music. The only reference cited in the article is CBC Radio itself, and news searches only return a few brief mentions from other sources. Newslinger (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Thank you, Bearcat, for pointing out my mistakes. Newslinger (talk) 04:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Newslinger (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Newslinger (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Newslinger (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Newslinger (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is not the case that the only reference cited in the article is CBC Radio itself — the source is Cashbox, a notable music magazine that is both reliable and independent of the CBC itself. And furthermore, national network distribution is a clean pass of WP:NMEDIA for a radio show. Yes, this needs more referencing than it has before it can be considered a good article, but it already has a strong enough notability claim and an independent reference for the purposes of being keepable as a stub. Bearcat (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.