Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBB Model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus for deletion DGG ( talk ) 17:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CBB Model[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline WP:A11, one published article by PhD candidates. No hits in scholar/Google. All references are from same people as term inventors. (also see Cultural neuropsychiatry) ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 19:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioral science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the content can easily find a home in Clinical neuroscience. Clinical Neuro is small and could easily absorb the CBB model ( and any other models ) and if it gets big we can spin out later but right now this Article doesn't stand on its own. Bryce Carmony (talk) 00:17, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't agree that the content should be moved, as there are no usable references for it at this time. Looie496 (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.