Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CARBS RFC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- CARBS RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for over 4 years. Puffin Let's talk! 21:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:RU/N. Completely unsourced. noq (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I usually spend much time defending Welsh rugby union teams on notability grounds, but this team is not notable on any level of WP:RU/N and exactly the sort of article that needs removing. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- I cannot see how a studnet Rugby team can be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.