Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CANUSA Flag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 02:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CANUSA Flag[edit]

This is not an encyclopaedia article, but appears to be more of a blog or opinion page. NMChico24 01:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is ironic, making an article page about deleting one. Alright NMChico24, I'll play along, please state why this seems like a blog or opinion page to you. Duhman0009 01:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "The CANUSA (short for CANADA USA) flag is a way to end the Canadian and American flag debates on Wikipedia talk pages. Don't you just love self-references, especially in the first sentence? MER-C 01:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phrases like this are to be expected in something that was created by someone. If articles created by someone weren't allowed, then why does this exist: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law Also, I need to add that it's against Wikipedia rules to make fun of a user AKA, kick him while he's down. Duhman0009 02:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- nn icon; it appears as though the author is attempting to make the icon popular, rather than writing about an icon that already is. AmiDaniel (talk) 02:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The icon didn't exist before I made it up. I don't think you quire understood the article. Duhman0009 02:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete This "article" does not assert the notability of its subject, a Wikipedia policy proposal for a specially created image. Duhman0009's comment on this page suggests that he does not understand WP:AfD, and I would guess that he may be confused about the main namespace as well. --Maxamegalon2000 02:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you were to have created that page, what would you have made different? Duhman0009 02:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.