Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CANUSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw Nomination as it has been cleaned up to the point where the notability issues have been met. (NAC) Tavix (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CANUSA

Unnotable "olympic" games per WP:ORG. Tavix (talk) 23:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing notable here. --Crusio (talk) 23:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I don't know, I'm seeing some media coverage. I think it's borderline, and definitely unusual for something that's supposedly been around since the '50s. However, I think there's actually something here. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A Google Book search seems to indicate that reliable sources are available to establish notability. A Google news search also turns up articles about the game such as this article. -- Whpq (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, since it passes the general notability guideline. Just now I've added two sources and there are plenty more just in The Hamilton Spectator, for example, that can be added. Also, it is the longest-running amateur sports competition in North America, according to the newspaper. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.