Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAHDİ Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CAHDİ Party[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable Somalian political party, and the article has some promotional content. It was CSD'd in April 2015, as well: [1]. Since then, however, the article has not made much progress. The only link provided was to the official website. Most results were either brief mentions, Wikipedia clones, or unreliable sources. There may be material in Somalian that I am unable to read, so I would appreciate if someone with familiarity with the language could help with that. This fails WP:ORGDEPTH. GAB^Hello! 20:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches simply found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think the fact the party is led by notable figures such as the former Prime Minister and the former Deputy Prime Minister could indicate some notability. The article needs a clean-up. Sources will be harder to find given the serious instability in Somalia and language issues. See WP:SYSTEMICBIAS AusLondonder (talk) 08:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable subject, but as per AusLondonder English-language sources are difficult to find. There are still some out there, though, and I'll try to improve the article a bit. Ajraddatz (talk) 00:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Contains zero references to independent reliable sources. WP:V therefore mandates deletion. Sandstein 12:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable party in a country with few international media sources. Wikipedia's systemic bias against organizations and people from non-western, anglophone countries needs to be taken into consideration.--TM 14:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With international offices and a couple of notable people in the party, it definitely warrants to be kept. In veritas (talk) 01:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.