Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.E.R.E.S.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 08:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C.E.R.E.S.

Delete seems to fail WP:CORP Dalamori 05:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CORP, I didn't find very many relevant ghits outside Wiki and mirrors. Royboy crashfan 05:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable company, fails WP:CORP --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn Gflores ^Talk 06:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete crap article. not notable. Newyorktimescrossword 20:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 271000 Ghits seems notable enough for me Jcuk 22:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. --Jay(Reply) 23:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, surprising number of verified hits on google and even on google news. Client list includes some big time clients like Nike and Ford. Would probably pass WP:CORP based on publications; seems like there are tons, but I didn't go back to see which were reprints of press releases. Article should really, really be re-written to look less like crap, per Mr. Crossword. Kuru ^talk 00:19, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should also probably be renamed to just "Ceres (coalition)" as I don't think they ever use the acronym CERES, and certainly not with the periods. Kuru ^talk 00:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. This is a very influential group with massive press coverage that got written up as recently as this week in the NY Times [1]. -- JJay 19:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Cleanup, seems notable, though it's almost a substub right now. -Colin Kimbrell 22:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename (Kuru's suggestion, probably): The news section on their website seems to imply notability. TimBentley (talk) 23:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, rename, and edit. Looks notable and somewhat influential (see JJay's NY Times link). KBi 01:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.